BY&nbsp;<a href="https://kansasreflector.com/author/mchilson/">MORGAN CHILSON</a> <a href="https://kansasreflector.com/">Kansas Reflector</a>

TOPEKA — Fort Riley announced Wednesday that many civilian employees are furloughed as a result of the federal government shutdown that went into effect at midnight Tuesday.

In a social media post, Fort Riley said email messages and phone calls to affected civilian staff will not be answered and many social media channeled will not be monitored.

More than 15 departments were closed, according to the post, including Public Affairs, Soldier and Family Assistance Center, some child care services, the Recycling Center and the Military Personnel Division administration.

Other departments&nbsp;<a href="https://www.facebook.com/FortRiley/posts/pfbid02xtT4ukJa9FxrxzHqVbqTepydihno6fYpaZ5RQmhKhhd9mcAFj3YCEH16ueiroXRcl" target="_blank">are scheduling work by appointment only</a>.

“Those who still report to work are classified as exempt and are generally in the life/health/safety fields,” Fort Riley’s social media posted in response to a question about who is affected. “Those who are not exempt do not report to work until funding is restored.”

A separate social media post referred people to the U.S. Defense Department’s website, which reads: “Military personnel will continue in a normal duty status, without pay, until such time as a continuing resolution or appropriations are passed by Congress and signed into law. Civilian personnel not engaged in excepted activities will be placed in a non-work, non-pay status.”

Fort Riley also postponed its Retiree Appreciation Day scheduled for Saturday.

In federal information posted online about the government shutdown, federal civilian paychecks for Sept. 7–Sept. 20 would not be delayed. Those checks generally arrive between Sept. 26 and Oct. 2, the information said.

<figure>
 <img src="https://media.eaglewebservices.com/public/2025/10/1759406650396.png" alt="Fort Riley has closed more than 15 offices as a result of the government shutdown and the furlough of some civilian employees. (U.S. Defense Department)" />
 <figcaption>Fort Riley has closed more than 15 offices as a result of the government shutdown and the furlough of some civilian employees. (U.S. Defense Department)</figcaption>
 </figure>BY&nbsp;<a href="https://kansasreflector.com/author/mchilson/">MORGAN CHILSON</a> <a href="https://kansasreflector.com/">Kansas Reflector</a>TOPEKA — Fort Riley announced Wednesday that many civilian employees are furloughed as a result of the federal government shutdown that went into effect at midnight Tuesday.In a social media post, Fort Riley said email messages and phone calls to affected civilian staff will not be answered and many social media channeled will not be monitored.More than 15 departments were closed, according to the post, including Public Affairs, Soldier and Family Assistance Center, some child care services, the Recycling Center and the Military Personnel Division administration.Other departments&nbsp;<a href="https://www.facebook.com/FortRiley/posts/pfbid02xtT4ukJa9FxrxzHqVbqTepydihno6fYpaZ5RQmhKhhd9mcAFj3YCEH16ueiroXRcl" target="_blank">are scheduling work by appointment only</a>.“Those who still report to work are classified as exempt and are generally in the life/health/safety fields,” Fort Riley’s social media posted in response to a question about who is affected. “Those who are not exempt do not report to work until funding is restored.”A separate social media post referred people to the U.S. Defense Department’s website, which reads: “Military personnel will continue in a normal duty status, without pay, until such time as a continuing resolution or appropriations are passed by Congress and signed into law. Civilian personnel not engaged in excepted activities will be placed in a non-work, non-pay status.”Fort Riley also postponed its Retiree Appreciation Day scheduled for Saturday.In federal information posted online about the government shutdown, federal civilian paychecks for Sept. 7–Sept. 20 would not be delayed. Those checks generally arrive between Sept. 26 and Oct. 2, the information said.

Fort Riley closes 15+ departments, furloughs employees after federal government shutdown

By CRISTINA JANNEY Hays Post

Hays Police Chief Don Scheibler at a Wednesday night vigil for Sgt. Scott Heimann said that his deep faith had been shaken in the wake of the&nbsp;<a href="https://hayspost.com/posts/259a0a4e-7e84-4de0-abd6-7a961ab84091">Sunday killing in the line of duty of one of his officers</a>.

He added he continued to find comfort in the word of God.

Heimann served on the Hays Police Department since 2016, all of those years under the direction of Scheibler. He was serving as a patrol sergeant when he was killed, having recently been promoted.

Mourners gathered Wednesday night at the Thomas More Prep-Marian grotto for a candlelight vigil for Heimann. Many of them were his peers dressed in uniform. The Kansas Highway Patrol offered a special escort for the family.

"Scott was an amazing and talented man," Scheibler said. "He was kind and compassionate and caring in all that he did. Scott was so smart, so strong. He had an amazing sense of humor.&nbsp;

"If Scott were here, he would tell you he was handsome too," Scheibler said, which brought giggles from the crowd.

He said Heimann could have done anything in the world and been successful. He wanted to be a Hays Police officer.

"He wanted to stand on the wall and protect this community," Scheibler said. "I think it's important that you know that he wanted to protect you."

He said this made him successful throughout his career. Scheibler said he was a strong leader and a mentor for the Hays Police Department.

Scheibler said Heimann joked with him that he was keeping the seat warm for him, as Scott hoped to one day be the chief of the Hays Police Department.

"Scott impacted our community in so many ways," he said, "By reading books to children in the library, giving knuckle bumps as kids walked to school, wrestling drunks in the bar, to responding to the most dangerous threats in our community."

Scheibler's voice began to waver, "During the last few days, as my thoughts dwell on Scott, I'm reminded of the Bible verse Isiah 6:8.

"And I heard the voice of the Lord saying, 'Whom should I send? Who will go for us?' And I said, 'Here I am.'"

"When evil came to our community that night, like so many other times for the members of the Special Situation Response Team, he left his family, he left the comfort and safety of his home and raised his hand and said, 'Here I am.'"

He called Heimann his friend, his brother in blue and his hero.

"... not because of how he fell, but how he lived to serve," Scheibler said. "I find assurance in Matthew 5:9. 'Blessed are the peacemakers because they will be called the children of God.'"

He called Heimann the ultimate peacemaker.

"God bless Scott, and may the example of his life bring peace to us all," Scheibler said.

Heimann, 32, was a 2012 graduate of TMP, the Catholic middle and high school in Hays. He was a member of Immaculate Heart of Mary Catholic Church in Hays and was noted by many as a devout Catholic.

Fr. Fred Gatsche spoke to the mourners, "This evening we are going to acknowledge the hurt, the sense of loss, the grief, the anger, the frustration with the whole situation. As we go through the vigil tomorrow and the funeral, we will interject more hope and consolation."

Gatsche read Psalm 22, which was the Psalm that Jesus cited when he was on the cross.

The Psalm begins, "My God! My God! Why have you abandoned me? Why so far from my call for help, my cries of anguish?"

As the Psalm continues, it says, "but you, oh Lord, do not stay far off. My strength comes quickly to help me, deliver my soul from the sword."

He concluded by quoting St. Theresa of Avila, "Let nothing upset you. Let nothing startle you. All things pass. God does not change. Patience wins all that it seeks. Whoever has God lacks nothing. God alone is enough."

Mayor Sandy Jacobs called Heimann a brave soul who made the ultimate sacrifice.&nbsp;

"On behalf of the city, my fellow commissioners and city staff, we extend our deepest condolences to the family and friends and colleagues of the fallen officer, Sgt. Scott Heimann. His service and sacrifice serving our community will never be forgotten," she said.

"We stand united with our police department and the entire community as we navigate this really difficult time," she said.&nbsp;

She asked the community to keep all those affected in their thoughts and prayers.

"Scott Heimann was more than just a uniform. He was a protector, a neighbor, a friend, a husband and a father. He was someone who stood tall every day, not knowing what the shift might bring, but always showing up with courage and commitment."

<a href="https://hayspost.com/posts/259a0a4e-7e84-4de0-abd6-7a961ab84091">Heimann is survived by his wife,&nbsp;Beth, and a young son and daughter.</a>&nbsp;His parents and mother-in-law and father-in-law are also Hays residents.

Jacobs continued, "Tonight we hold these candles, not only to mourn and honor, to shine light in the darkness of loss and to say to family and the department and each other, 'You are not alone.'"

"To Scott's family, your pain is unimaginable, and no words can make it easier, but please know, Scott did not serve in vain.&nbsp;

"This city is safer, stronger and better because of his sacrifice. We are forever in his debt," she said.

"To all that are gathered here," Jacobs said, "May this night remind us of the power of unity, the strength of community and the enduring light of service and love."

The vigil was concluded with a song sung by TMP students, followed by a prayer led by Fr. Gatsche.

A visitation for Heimann will be from 4 to 8 p.m. today at Immaculate Heart of Mary Catholic Church. Mass of Christian Burial will be at 10:30 a.m. on Friday at Gross Memorial Coliseum.

Hays Post will offer a live stream of the funeral in cooperation with Tiger Media Network through YouTube.

<figure>
 <img src="https://media.eaglewebservices.com/public/2025/10/1759373790773.jpeg" alt="Hays Police Chief Don Scheibler exits the vigil for Hays Police Sgt. Scott Heimann followed by members of the family. Photo by Cristina Janney/Hays Post" />
 <figcaption>Hays Police Chief Don Scheibler exits the vigil for Hays Police Sgt. Scott Heimann followed by members of the family. Photo by Cristina Janney/Hays Post</figcaption>
 </figure>By CRISTINA JANNEY Hays PostHays Police Chief Don Scheibler at a Wednesday night vigil for Sgt. Scott Heimann said that his deep faith had been shaken in the wake of the&nbsp;<a href="https://hayspost.com/posts/259a0a4e-7e84-4de0-abd6-7a961ab84091">Sunday killing in the line of duty of one of his officers</a>.He added he continued to find comfort in the word of God.Heimann served on the Hays Police Department since 2016, all of those years under the direction of Scheibler. He was serving as a patrol sergeant when he was killed, having recently been promoted.Mourners gathered Wednesday night at the Thomas More Prep-Marian grotto for a candlelight vigil for Heimann. Many of them were his peers dressed in uniform. The Kansas Highway Patrol offered a special escort for the family.<figure>
 <img src="https://media.eaglewebservices.com/public/2025/10/1759373963756.jpeg" alt="Members of law enforcement are given hugs after the vigil for Sgt. Scott Heimanm, who was killed in the line of duty on Sunday. Photo by Cristina Janney Hays Post" />
 <figcaption>Members of law enforcement are given hugs after the vigil for Sgt. Scott Heimanm, who was killed in the line of duty on Sunday. Photo by Cristina Janney Hays Post</figcaption>
 </figure><figure>
 <img src="https://media.eaglewebservices.com/public/2025/10/1759375077046.jpeg" alt="Officers console each other at a vigil for Hays Police Sgt. Scott Heimann, who was killed in the line of duty on Sunday. Photo by Cristina Janney/Hays Post" />
 <figcaption>Officers console each other at a vigil for Hays Police Sgt. Scott Heimann, who was killed in the line of duty on Sunday. Photo by Cristina Janney/Hays Post</figcaption>
 </figure>"Scott was an amazing and talented man," Scheibler said. "He was kind and compassionate and caring in all that he did. Scott was so smart, so strong. He had an amazing sense of humor.&nbsp;"If Scott were here, he would tell you he was handsome too," Scheibler said, which brought giggles from the crowd.He said Heimann could have done anything in the world and been successful. He wanted to be a Hays Police officer."He wanted to stand on the wall and protect this community," Scheibler said. "I think it's important that you know that he wanted to protect you."He said this made him successful throughout his career. Scheibler said he was a strong leader and a mentor for the Hays Police Department.Scheibler said Heimann joked with him that he was keeping the seat warm for him, as Scott hoped to one day be the chief of the Hays Police Department."Scott impacted our community in so many ways," he said, "By reading books to children in the library, giving knuckle bumps as kids walked to school, wrestling drunks in the bar, to responding to the most dangerous threats in our community."<figure>
 <img src="https://media.eaglewebservices.com/public/2025/10/1759374210478.jpeg" alt="Law enforcement officers leaving the vigil for Sgt. Scott Heimann, who was killed in the line of duty. Photo by Cristina Janney/Hays Post" />
 <figcaption>Law enforcement officers leaving the vigil for Sgt. Scott Heimann, who was killed in the line of duty. Photo by Cristina Janney/Hays Post</figcaption>
 </figure>Scheibler's voice began to waver, "During the last few days, as my thoughts dwell on Scott, I'm reminded of the Bible verse Isiah 6:8."And I heard the voice of the Lord saying, 'Whom should I send? Who will go for us?' And I said, 'Here I am.'""When evil came to our community that night, like so many other times for the members of the Special Situation Response Team, he left his family, he left the comfort and safety of his home and raised his hand and said, 'Here I am.'"He called Heimann his friend, his brother in blue and his hero."... not because of how he fell, but how he lived to serve," Scheibler said. "I find assurance in Matthew 5:9. 'Blessed are the peacemakers because they will be called the children of God.'"He called Heimann the ultimate peacemaker."God bless Scott, and may the example of his life bring peace to us all," Scheibler said.<figure>
 <img src="https://media.eaglewebservices.com/public/2025/10/1759374433450.jpeg" alt="Hays Police Chief Don Scheibler receives a hug after the vigil for Sgt. Scott Heimann, who was killed in the line of duty on Sunday. Photo by Cristina Janney/Hays Post" />
 <figcaption>Hays Police Chief Don Scheibler receives a hug after the vigil for Sgt. Scott Heimann, who was killed in the line of duty on Sunday. Photo by Cristina Janney/Hays Post</figcaption>
 </figure><figure>
 <img src="https://media.eaglewebservices.com/public/2025/10/1759374749420.jpeg" alt=" " />
 <figcaption> </figcaption>
 </figure>Heimann, 32, was a 2012 graduate of TMP, the Catholic middle and high school in Hays. He was a member of Immaculate Heart of Mary Catholic Church in Hays and was noted by many as a devout Catholic.Fr. Fred Gatsche spoke to the mourners, "This evening we are going to acknowledge the hurt, the sense of loss, the grief, the anger, the frustration with the whole situation. As we go through the vigil tomorrow and the funeral, we will interject more hope and consolation."Gatsche read Psalm 22, which was the Psalm that Jesus cited when he was on the cross.The Psalm begins, "My God! My God! Why have you abandoned me? Why so far from my call for help, my cries of anguish?"As the Psalm continues, it says, "but you, oh Lord, do not stay far off. My strength comes quickly to help me, deliver my soul from the sword."He concluded by quoting St. Theresa of Avila, "Let nothing upset you. Let nothing startle you. All things pass. God does not change. Patience wins all that it seeks. Whoever has God lacks nothing. God alone is enough."<figure>
 <img src="https://media.eaglewebservices.com/public/2025/10/1759375201715.jpeg" alt="Kansas Highway Patrol officers stand at attention at the vigil for Hays Police Sgt. Scott Heimann, who was killed in the line of duty on Sunday. Photo by Cristina Janney/Hays Post" />
 <figcaption>Kansas Highway Patrol officers stand at attention at the vigil for Hays Police Sgt. Scott Heimann, who was killed in the line of duty on Sunday. Photo by Cristina Janney/Hays Post</figcaption>
 </figure><figure>
 <img src="https://media.eaglewebservices.com/public/2025/10/1759375360653.jpeg" alt="Mayor Sandy Jacobs extends condolences to Sgt. Scott Heimann's family and friends at a vigil for the fallen officer on Wednesday. Photo by Cristina Janney/Hays Post" />
 <figcaption>Mayor Sandy Jacobs extends condolences to Sgt. Scott Heimann's family and friends at a vigil for the fallen officer on Wednesday. Photo by Cristina Janney/Hays Post</figcaption>
 </figure>Mayor Sandy Jacobs called Heimann a brave soul who made the ultimate sacrifice.&nbsp;"On behalf of the city, my fellow commissioners and city staff, we extend our deepest condolences to the family and friends and colleagues of the fallen officer, Sgt. Scott Heimann. His service and sacrifice serving our community will never be forgotten," she said."We stand united with our police department and the entire community as we navigate this really difficult time," she said.&nbsp;She asked the community to keep all those affected in their thoughts and prayers."Scott Heimann was more than just a uniform. He was a protector, a neighbor, a friend, a husband and a father. He was someone who stood tall every day, not knowing what the shift might bring, but always showing up with courage and commitment."<a href="https://hayspost.com/posts/259a0a4e-7e84-4de0-abd6-7a961ab84091">Heimann is survived by his wife,&nbsp;Beth, and a young son and daughter.</a>&nbsp;His parents and mother-in-law and father-in-law are also Hays residents.Jacobs continued, "Tonight we hold these candles, not only to mourn and honor, to shine light in the darkness of loss and to say to family and the department and each other, 'You are not alone.'""To Scott's family, your pain is unimaginable, and no words can make it easier, but please know, Scott did not serve in vain.&nbsp;"This city is safer, stronger and better because of his sacrifice. We are forever in his debt," she said."To all that are gathered here," Jacobs said, "May this night remind us of the power of unity, the strength of community and the enduring light of service and love."The vigil was concluded with a song sung by TMP students, followed by a prayer led by Fr. Gatsche.A visitation for Heimann will be from 4 to 8 p.m. today at Immaculate Heart of Mary Catholic Church. Mass of Christian Burial will be at 10:30 a.m. on Friday at Gross Memorial Coliseum.Hays Post will offer a live stream of the funeral in cooperation with Tiger Media Network through YouTube.

Vigil: Community shaken by officer's death, but blessed by 'ultimate peacemaker'

MONTGMERY COUNTY— A driver injured in a crash during a police chase in Montgomery County is now facing a possible murder charge.

Three people were injured in the accident that occurred just after 4p.m. on September 26 and one later died.

The Kansas Highway Patrol reported a 2024 Jeep driven by Tenisha D.&nbsp;Mayberry, 38, Blue Springs, Mo., was northbound on Patterson Boulevard fleeing law enforcement. The driver failed to yield at a stop light at 8th Street in Coffeyville and struck the passenger side of eastbound Chevy Tahoe driven by Maia E, O'Connell, 17, Coffeyville.

After impact the Jeep traveled off the road and overturned. The Tahoe left the road and rolled onto its roof.

EMS transported Mayberry, a passenger in the Jeep Cortez J. Wasson, Jr. 19,&nbsp; Blue Springs, Missouri and O'Connell to Coffeyville Regional Hospital. EMS transported a passenger in the Tahoe Serafina L&nbsp; O'Connell, 15, Coffeyville, to&nbsp;St Francis Hospital in Tulsa where she later died. Wasson was not wearing a seat belt, according to the KHP.&nbsp;&nbsp;

Mayberry is being held on requested charges of felony interference with law enforcement, felony fleeing or attempting to elude a law enforcement officer, Aggravated battery; Reckless deadly weapon cause great body harm/disfig/death, Possession of marijuana, according to online jail records.

Wasson is being held on requested charges of&nbsp;felony interference with law enforcement, Aggravated battery; Reckless deadly weapon cause great body harm/disfig/death and possession of marijuana.

<figure>
 <img src="https://media.eaglewebservices.com/public/2025/9/1759094141027.png" alt="Wasson photo Montgomery Co." />
 <figcaption>Wasson photo Montgomery Co.</figcaption>
 </figure>MONTGMERY COUNTY— A driver injured in a crash during a police chase in Montgomery County is now facing a possible murder charge.Three people were injured in the accident that occurred just after 4p.m. on September 26 and one later died.The Kansas Highway Patrol reported a 2024 Jeep driven by Tenisha D.&nbsp;Mayberry, 38, Blue Springs, Mo., was northbound on Patterson Boulevard fleeing law enforcement. The driver failed to yield at a stop light at 8th Street in Coffeyville and struck the passenger side of eastbound Chevy Tahoe driven by Maia E, O'Connell, 17, Coffeyville.<figure>
 <img src="https://media.eaglewebservices.com/public/2025/9/1759094019310.png" alt="Mayberry photo Montgomery Co." />
 <figcaption>Mayberry photo Montgomery Co.</figcaption>
 </figure>After impact the Jeep traveled off the road and overturned. The Tahoe left the road and rolled onto its roof.EMS transported Mayberry, a passenger in the Jeep Cortez J. Wasson, Jr. 19,&nbsp; Blue Springs, Missouri and O'Connell to Coffeyville Regional Hospital. EMS transported a passenger in the Tahoe Serafina L&nbsp; O'Connell, 15, Coffeyville, to&nbsp;St Francis Hospital in Tulsa where she later died. Wasson was not wearing a seat belt, according to the KHP.&nbsp;&nbsp;Mayberry is being held on requested charges of felony interference with law enforcement, felony fleeing or attempting to elude a law enforcement officer, Aggravated battery; Reckless deadly weapon cause great body harm/disfig/death, Possession of marijuana, according to online jail records.Wasson is being held on requested charges of&nbsp;felony interference with law enforcement, Aggravated battery; Reckless deadly weapon cause great body harm/disfig/death and possession of marijuana.

Mo. woman faces additional charge after teen dies in crash during chase

KANSAS CITY —Law enforcement are investigating another homicide in Kansas City have identified the victim as 57-year-old Cleveland Wright, according to KCPD Sgt. Phil DiMartino.

Just before 8:30p.m. Sept. 24, police were dispatched to the intersection of Gardiner and N. Chouteau Avenue in Kansas City, Missouri on a reported shooting, according to&nbsp;Officer Alayna Gonzalez.

When officers arrived to the scene, they located a vehicle that had been stopped near the intersection with an unresponsive driver inside. Upon further evaluation, officers determined the individual, later identified as Wright, was suffering from apparent, gunshot trauma, and immediately began rendering medical aid until EMS personnel responded.

Wright&nbsp; was transported to an area hospital with life-threatening injuries where he was subsequently pronounced deceased.

Preliminary investigation indicates Wright was inside of the vehicle when he was struck by gunfire. It is undetermined at this time if the suspect was an individual inside of another vehicle, or traveling on foot. 

Police do not currently have a person of interest identified and there is not anyone in police custody.

KANSAS CITY —Law enforcement are investigating another homicide in Kansas City have identified the victim as 57-year-old Cleveland Wright, according to KCPD Sgt. Phil DiMartino.Just before 8:30p.m. Sept. 24, police were dispatched to the intersection of Gardiner and N. Chouteau Avenue in Kansas City, Missouri on a reported shooting, according to&nbsp;Officer Alayna Gonzalez.When officers arrived to the scene, they located a vehicle that had been stopped near the intersection with an unresponsive driver inside. Upon further evaluation, officers determined the individual, later identified as Wright, was suffering from apparent, gunshot trauma, and immediately began rendering medical aid until EMS personnel responded.Wright&nbsp; was transported to an area hospital with life-threatening injuries where he was subsequently pronounced deceased.Preliminary investigation indicates Wright was inside of the vehicle when he was struck by gunfire. It is undetermined at this time if the suspect was an individual inside of another vehicle, or traveling on foot. Police do not currently have a person of interest identified and there is not anyone in police custody.

Police ID shooting victim found in vehicle on KC street

Former Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey and Republican AGs from two other states intervened in a case brought by anti-abortion groups. After the U.S. Supreme Court said those groups couldn’t sue, Missouri became the lead plaintiff

BY:&nbsp;<a href="https://missouriindependent.com/author/annaspoerre/">ANNA SPOERRE</a> <a href="https://missouriindependent.com/2023/02/20/state-senator-throws-first-punches-of-2024-missouri-governors-campaign/">Missouri Independent</a>

A federal case challenging the safety of mifepristone, used to treat miscarriages and to induce abortions early in pregnancy, is being transferred out of Texas to a federal court in Missouri.

The lawsuit demands the federal government restore its previous restrictions on mifepristone by requiring three in-person doctor visits, reducing the gestational period during which the medication can be taken from 10 weeks to seven and rolling back recent federal policy that allowed for the mailing of mifepristone and allowed for prescriptions to be made online or through pharmacies.

“This case has always been about ideology, not patient safety,” Emily Wales, president and CEO of Planned Parenthood Great Plains said in a statement Wednesday, “It’s no surprise it has now been transferred to a district where nearly half the bench was elevated to the judiciary after undermining abortion rights at the Missouri attorney general’s office.”

Four of the court’s nine judges were appointed in May by President Donald Trump. Two, Josh Divine and Maria Lanahan, worked on the mifepristone case before their appointments.

“This order ensures Missouri’s case will be heard where it belongs: in Missouri,” the Missouri Attorney General’s Office said in a statement Wednesday. “We will continue protecting the health and safety of women and children in our state and continue fighting to hold the Biden Administration and its allies accountable for unlawfully loosening safeguards on chemical abortion drugs.”

The initial lawsuit was filed in Texas by a group of anti-abortion doctors and medical organizations. In June 2024,&nbsp;<a href="https://missouriindependent.com/2024/06/13/breaking-u-s-supreme-court-rejects-attempt-to-limit-access-to-abortion-pill/">the U.S. Supreme Court rejected the original lawsuit&nbsp;</a>after concluding the plaintiffs did not have standing to sue because they couldn’t show they had been harmed.&nbsp;<a href="https://missouriindependent.com/2024/10/21/missouri-senate-race-abortion-hawley-kunce/">Erin Morrow Hawley</a>&nbsp;argued the case in front of the nation’s highest court on behalf of the initial plaintiffs. She is the wife of U.S. Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri.

Soon after, the&nbsp;<a href="https://missouriindependent.com/2024/10/22/missouri-mifepristone-lawsuit-andrew-bailey-teen-pregnancy/">attorneys general from Missouri, Kansas and Idaho refiled the litigation</a>. The defendants in the case — the FDA and mifepristone’s manufacturer —&nbsp;asked that the latest case be thrown out.&nbsp;

On Tuesday, Texas federal judge Matthew Kacsmaryk declined that request and transferred the case to the Eastern District of Missouri in St. Louis. Kacsmaryk wrote that he had no jurisdiction over the remaining plaintiffs.

“Instead of returning this years-long case to square one,” Kacsmaryk wrote that it made sense to transfer the case to “avoid the costs and delay” that would surely come from dismissing the case only to have a plaintiff re-file it in another jurisdiction.&nbsp;

Kacsmaryk said he chose Missouri among the states suing because “the Eastern District of Missouri is an accessible district with a major city.”

In his ruling, Kacsmaryk seemed reluctant to give up the case. He wrote that precedent “led every jurist who assessed this case to conclude that the original plaintiffs had a jurisdictionally valid case.”

But the Supreme Court didn’t agree, he noted, and “it is not the province of lower courts to defy the Supreme Court.”

Had Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton sought to intervene earlier, Kacsmaryk noted, he could have kept the case in his court as jurisdictional issues “would have easily been satisfied.”

Right now, medication abortion is inaccessible through Planned Parenthood clinics in Missouri.&nbsp;

Last November, voters codified the right to abortion in the state constitution. Now,&nbsp;<a href="https://missouriindependent.com/2025/09/11/laws-regulations-medication-abortion-mifepristone-misoprostol-missouri/">a Jackson County judge is weighing whether to keep in place two state regulations</a>&nbsp;that Planned Parenthood says are preventing its providers from performing medication abortions in Missouri.&nbsp;

The Missouri Attorney General’s Office has argued in court filings that the lawsuit was filed to re-establish “long-standing safety requirements” for mifepristone. In ongoing court cases surrounding regulations around abortion in Missouri, the attorney general’s office has repeatedly painted mifepristone as a dangerous medication.

“The FDA has enabled online abortion providers to mail FDA-approved abortion drugs to women in states that regulate abortion — dispensing abortion drugs with no doctor care, no exam and no in-person follow-up care,” the attorneys general wrote in the amended lawsuit last year. “These dangerous drugs are now flooding states like Missouri and Idaho and sending women in these states to the emergency room.” &nbsp;

They also argued that current regulations around mifepristone make it impossible to track and prevent medication abortions.&nbsp;

“All of this makes it difficult for state law enforcement to detect and deter state law violations and to give effect to state abortion laws,” the attorneys general wrote.&nbsp;

According to the FDA,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.fda.gov/drugs/postmarket-drug-safety-information-patients-and-providers/questions-and-answers-mifepristone-medical-termination-pregnancy-through-ten-weeks-gestation#:~:text=When%20did%20the%20FDA%20approve,ten%20weeks%20gestation%20in%202016." target="_blank">mifepristone is safe to use if taken as directed.</a>&nbsp;

Cramping and bleeding are common side effects of the medication. Those prescribed mifepristone are urged to call their doctor&nbsp;<a href="https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2023/020687Orig1s025Lbl.pdf#page=16" target="_blank">if they experience heavy bleeding, abdominal pain or a fever.&nbsp;</a>The same guidance applies to those who recently underwent surgical abortions, experienced miscarriages or delivered a baby.

Since the medication was approved for use 28 years ago,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.fda.gov/media/164331/download" target="_blank">32 deaths have been reported associated with mifepristone,</a>&nbsp;according to the FDA. The report evaluates data from 5.9 million women who took mifepristone between 2000 and 2022. Of the three dozen deaths, 11 were the result of sepsis, 20 were homicides and two were suicides.

Last year, while arguing in court records that mifepristone harms Missouri and therefore the state has the standing to sue, former Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey contended access to mifepristone lowered “birth rates for teenaged mothers,” contributing to a population loss along with “diminishment of political representation and loss of federal funds.”

“Younger women are more likely to navigate online abortion finders or websites ordering mail-order medication to self-manage abortions,” the filing reads.

Abortion rights advocates and medical professionals continue to argue that mifepristone is safe.&nbsp;

“In Missouri, we are all too familiar with the attacks on medication abortion not grounded in science,” Margot Riphagen, president and CEO, Planned Parenthood Great Rivers, said in a statement Wednesday. “And continue to witness the detrimental public health outcomes as a result of politically motivated lawsuits, misinformation, and restrictions.”

<figure>
 <img src="https://media.eaglewebservices.com/public/2025/10/1759399748077.png" alt="The Thomas F. Eagleton U.S. Courthouse in St. Louis, home of the United States District Court of the Eastern District of Missouri (Rebecca Rivas/Missouri Independen" />
 <figcaption>The Thomas F. Eagleton U.S. Courthouse in St. Louis, home of the United States District Court of the Eastern District of Missouri (Rebecca Rivas/Missouri Independen</figcaption>
 </figure><h2>Former Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey and Republican AGs from two other states intervened in a case brought by anti-abortion groups. After the U.S. Supreme Court said those groups couldn’t sue, Missouri became the lead plaintiff</h2>BY:&nbsp;<a href="https://missouriindependent.com/author/annaspoerre/">ANNA SPOERRE</a> <a href="https://missouriindependent.com/2023/02/20/state-senator-throws-first-punches-of-2024-missouri-governors-campaign/">Missouri Independent</a>A federal case challenging the safety of mifepristone, used to treat miscarriages and to induce abortions early in pregnancy, is being transferred out of Texas to a federal court in Missouri.The lawsuit demands the federal government restore its previous restrictions on mifepristone by requiring three in-person doctor visits, reducing the gestational period during which the medication can be taken from 10 weeks to seven and rolling back recent federal policy that allowed for the mailing of mifepristone and allowed for prescriptions to be made online or through pharmacies.“This case has always been about ideology, not patient safety,” Emily Wales, president and CEO of Planned Parenthood Great Plains said in a statement Wednesday, “It’s no surprise it has now been transferred to a district where nearly half the bench was elevated to the judiciary after undermining abortion rights at the Missouri attorney general’s office.”Four of the court’s nine judges were appointed in May by President Donald Trump. Two, Josh Divine and Maria Lanahan, worked on the mifepristone case before their appointments.“This order ensures Missouri’s case will be heard where it belongs: in Missouri,” the Missouri Attorney General’s Office said in a statement Wednesday. “We will continue protecting the health and safety of women and children in our state and continue fighting to hold the Biden Administration and its allies accountable for unlawfully loosening safeguards on chemical abortion drugs.”The initial lawsuit was filed in Texas by a group of anti-abortion doctors and medical organizations. In June 2024,&nbsp;<a href="https://missouriindependent.com/2024/06/13/breaking-u-s-supreme-court-rejects-attempt-to-limit-access-to-abortion-pill/">the U.S. Supreme Court rejected the original lawsuit&nbsp;</a>after concluding the plaintiffs did not have standing to sue because they couldn’t show they had been harmed.&nbsp;<a href="https://missouriindependent.com/2024/10/21/missouri-senate-race-abortion-hawley-kunce/">Erin Morrow Hawley</a>&nbsp;argued the case in front of the nation’s highest court on behalf of the initial plaintiffs. She is the wife of U.S. Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri.Soon after, the&nbsp;<a href="https://missouriindependent.com/2024/10/22/missouri-mifepristone-lawsuit-andrew-bailey-teen-pregnancy/">attorneys general from Missouri, Kansas and Idaho refiled the litigation</a>. The defendants in the case — the FDA and mifepristone’s manufacturer —&nbsp;asked that the latest case be thrown out.&nbsp;On Tuesday, Texas federal judge Matthew Kacsmaryk declined that request and transferred the case to the Eastern District of Missouri in St. Louis. Kacsmaryk wrote that he had no jurisdiction over the remaining plaintiffs.“Instead of returning this years-long case to square one,” Kacsmaryk wrote that it made sense to transfer the case to “avoid the costs and delay” that would surely come from dismissing the case only to have a plaintiff re-file it in another jurisdiction.&nbsp;Kacsmaryk said he chose Missouri among the states suing because “the Eastern District of Missouri is an accessible district with a major city.”In his ruling, Kacsmaryk seemed reluctant to give up the case. He wrote that precedent “led every jurist who assessed this case to conclude that the original plaintiffs had a jurisdictionally valid case.”But the Supreme Court didn’t agree, he noted, and “it is not the province of lower courts to defy the Supreme Court.”Had Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton sought to intervene earlier, Kacsmaryk noted, he could have kept the case in his court as jurisdictional issues “would have easily been satisfied.”Right now, medication abortion is inaccessible through Planned Parenthood clinics in Missouri.&nbsp;Last November, voters codified the right to abortion in the state constitution. Now,&nbsp;<a href="https://missouriindependent.com/2025/09/11/laws-regulations-medication-abortion-mifepristone-misoprostol-missouri/">a Jackson County judge is weighing whether to keep in place two state regulations</a>&nbsp;that Planned Parenthood says are preventing its providers from performing medication abortions in Missouri.&nbsp;The Missouri Attorney General’s Office has argued in court filings that the lawsuit was filed to re-establish “long-standing safety requirements” for mifepristone. In ongoing court cases surrounding regulations around abortion in Missouri, the attorney general’s office has repeatedly painted mifepristone as a dangerous medication.“The FDA has enabled online abortion providers to mail FDA-approved abortion drugs to women in states that regulate abortion — dispensing abortion drugs with no doctor care, no exam and no in-person follow-up care,” the attorneys general wrote in the amended lawsuit last year. “These dangerous drugs are now flooding states like Missouri and Idaho and sending women in these states to the emergency room.” &nbsp;They also argued that current regulations around mifepristone make it impossible to track and prevent medication abortions.&nbsp;“All of this makes it difficult for state law enforcement to detect and deter state law violations and to give effect to state abortion laws,” the attorneys general wrote.&nbsp;According to the FDA,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.fda.gov/drugs/postmarket-drug-safety-information-patients-and-providers/questions-and-answers-mifepristone-medical-termination-pregnancy-through-ten-weeks-gestation#:~:text=When%20did%20the%20FDA%20approve,ten%20weeks%20gestation%20in%202016." target="_blank">mifepristone is safe to use if taken as directed.</a>&nbsp;Cramping and bleeding are common side effects of the medication. Those prescribed mifepristone are urged to call their doctor&nbsp;<a href="https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2023/020687Orig1s025Lbl.pdf#page=16" target="_blank">if they experience heavy bleeding, abdominal pain or a fever.&nbsp;</a>The same guidance applies to those who recently underwent surgical abortions, experienced miscarriages or delivered a baby.Since the medication was approved for use 28 years ago,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.fda.gov/media/164331/download" target="_blank">32 deaths have been reported associated with mifepristone,</a>&nbsp;according to the FDA. The report evaluates data from 5.9 million women who took mifepristone between 2000 and 2022. Of the three dozen deaths, 11 were the result of sepsis, 20 were homicides and two were suicides.Last year, while arguing in court records that mifepristone harms Missouri and therefore the state has the standing to sue, former Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey contended access to mifepristone lowered “birth rates for teenaged mothers,” contributing to a population loss along with “diminishment of political representation and loss of federal funds.”“Younger women are more likely to navigate online abortion finders or websites ordering mail-order medication to self-manage abortions,” the filing reads.Abortion rights advocates and medical professionals continue to argue that mifepristone is safe.&nbsp;“In Missouri, we are all too familiar with the attacks on medication abortion not grounded in science,” Margot Riphagen, president and CEO, Planned Parenthood Great Rivers, said in a statement Wednesday. “And continue to witness the detrimental public health outcomes as a result of politically motivated lawsuits, misinformation, and restrictions.”

Federal lawsuit to limit access to abortion pill moved from Texas to Missouri

KANSAS CITY —A Kansas City faces charges for allegedly striking a man to death and then setting the house on fire earlier this month in Kansas City’s northeast neighborhood.

<a href="https://www.jacksoncountyprosecutor.com/DocumentCenter/View/2733/brown-dianna---complaint-packet-update-final">Dianna A. Brown</a>&nbsp;46, faces 2nd Degree Murder, Armed Criminal Action, 2nd Degree Arson, and Tampering with Physical Evidence in a Felony Prosecution, according to&nbsp;Jackson County Prosecutor Melesa Johnson.

<a href="https://www.jacksoncountyprosecutor.com/DocumentCenter/View/2732/Diana-Brown---PC-Statement-Redacted-final">According to court records</a>, on September 19, the Kansas City Fire Department was dispatched to an apartment building near Kensington Avenue and Independence Avenue on a reported fire. After extinguishing the fire, which was contained to only one portion of the building, firefighters located a deceased male with severe burns, apparent head trauma, and signs of decomposition.&nbsp;

Detectives responded to the scene and found mail and prescription medication belonging to the defendant at the location.&nbsp;

The Medical Examiner determined the victim’s cause of death as blunt force trauma of the head and the manner of death as homicide.&nbsp;

On Sept. 27, the detctives interviewed the defendant. She said that on Sept. 14, she was with the victim at his apartment when an argument began. After the argument stopped and the victim went to sleep, Brown told detectives she used a nearby hammer to strike the victim multiple times. She said she continued to live in the apartment until setting it on fire.&nbsp;

The defendant is being held on a $500,000 cash-only bond.&nbsp;

<figure>
 <img src="https://media.eaglewebservices.com/public/2025/9/1758311035022.png" alt="Scene of the investigation&nbsp; -photo courtesy KCTV" />
 <figcaption>Scene of the investigation&nbsp; -photo courtesy KCTV</figcaption>
 </figure>KANSAS CITY —A Kansas City faces charges for allegedly striking a man to death and then setting the house on fire earlier this month in Kansas City’s northeast neighborhood.<a href="https://www.jacksoncountyprosecutor.com/DocumentCenter/View/2733/brown-dianna---complaint-packet-update-final">Dianna A. Brown</a>&nbsp;46, faces 2nd Degree Murder, Armed Criminal Action, 2nd Degree Arson, and Tampering with Physical Evidence in a Felony Prosecution, according to&nbsp;Jackson County Prosecutor Melesa Johnson.<figure>
 <img src="https://media.eaglewebservices.com/public/2025/9/1759177714145.png" alt="Brown photo Jackson County" />
 <figcaption>Brown photo Jackson County</figcaption>
 </figure><a href="https://www.jacksoncountyprosecutor.com/DocumentCenter/View/2732/Diana-Brown---PC-Statement-Redacted-final">According to court records</a>, on September 19, the Kansas City Fire Department was dispatched to an apartment building near Kensington Avenue and Independence Avenue on a reported fire. After extinguishing the fire, which was contained to only one portion of the building, firefighters located a deceased male with severe burns, apparent head trauma, and signs of decomposition.&nbsp;Detectives responded to the scene and found mail and prescription medication belonging to the defendant at the location.&nbsp;The Medical Examiner determined the victim’s cause of death as blunt force trauma of the head and the manner of death as homicide.&nbsp;On Sept. 27, the detctives interviewed the defendant. She said that on Sept. 14, she was with the victim at his apartment when an argument began. After the argument stopped and the victim went to sleep, Brown told detectives she used a nearby hammer to strike the victim multiple times. She said she continued to live in the apartment until setting it on fire.&nbsp;The defendant is being held on a $500,000 cash-only bond.&nbsp;

KC woman allegedly bludgeoned man to death, set home on fire

DOUGLAS COUNTY—Law enforcement are investigating an accident that occurred just after 7a.m. Wednesday in Douglas County.

The Kansas Highway Patrol reported a 2022 Ford F350 driven by Kaden Roger Kerr, 19, Eudora, was southbound at&nbsp;173 E. 2338th Road. The truck rear-ended a 2017 IC School bus driven by Yesenia&nbsp;Vazquez-Arellano, 39, Edgerton, who was stopped with amber lights and stop sign activated, waiting for a student 

The bus had 11 juvenile passengers. Three had minor injuries. None of them required transport for treatment, according to the KHP.

DOUGLAS COUNTY—A stark reminder of the importance of paying attention while driving, ditching all distractions, and focusing on the road, according to a social media report from the Kansas Highway Patrol Troop B.

 While children were about to load onto a stopped school bus in Douglas County near U.S. 56 and Kansas 33, a truck rear-ended the bus. 

"Sixteen children on their way to school, in what is supposed to be the safest way to get them there, shook and jarred by another vehicle that failed to stop for the bus."

There were no injuries to any children headed to school and only minor injuries to the truck driver.&nbsp;

<figure>
 <img src="https://media.eaglewebservices.com/public/2025/10/1759332128673.png" alt="photo KHP Troop B" />
 <figcaption>photo KHP Troop B</figcaption>
 </figure>DOUGLAS COUNTY—Law enforcement are investigating an accident that occurred just after 7a.m. Wednesday in Douglas County.The Kansas Highway Patrol reported a 2022 Ford F350 driven by Kaden Roger Kerr, 19, Eudora, was southbound at&nbsp;173 E. 2338th Road. The truck rear-ended a 2017 IC School bus driven by Yesenia&nbsp;Vazquez-Arellano, 39, Edgerton, who was stopped with amber lights and stop sign activated, waiting for a student The bus had 11 juvenile passengers. Three had minor injuries. None of them required transport for treatment, according to the KHP.-------------DOUGLAS COUNTY—A stark reminder of the importance of paying attention while driving, ditching all distractions, and focusing on the road, according to a social media report from the Kansas Highway Patrol Troop B. While children were about to load onto a stopped school bus in Douglas County near U.S. 56 and Kansas 33, a truck rear-ended the bus. <figure>
 <img src="https://media.eaglewebservices.com/public/2025/10/1759332155160.png" alt="" />
 <figcaption></figcaption>
 </figure>"Sixteen children on their way to school, in what is supposed to be the safest way to get them there, shook and jarred by another vehicle that failed to stop for the bus."There were no injuries to any children headed to school and only minor injuries to the truck driver.&nbsp;

KHP updates details on truck, Kansas school bus accident

TOPEKA, Kan.&nbsp;– The Kansas Bureau of Investigation (KBI) executed numerous search warrants in cities across the state at vape shops and CBD dispensaries to seize products being sold illegally in Kansas, according to a media release from the agency.

On Wednesday,&nbsp; Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach and KBI Director Tony Mattivi announced KBI agents began a statewide enforcement operation, along with law enforcement partners, to seize marijuana vegetation, THC vape cartridges, and other items containing suspected illegal concentrations of THC (as prohibited in KSA 21-5705, and KSA 2-3908). In some instances, weapons and currency were also seized.

When these investigations conclude, the KBI will submit case findings to the prosecutor of jurisdiction for each charging decisions. Possible charges could include unlawful distribution of controlled substances and possession of controlled substances with the intent to sell.

“These illegal substances are in our homes, in our schools, and in the hands of our children. They are so widely-accessible that some Kansans are under the impression they are safe,” said KBI Director Tony Mattivi. “Anyone who sells illicit products poses a direct and unacceptable threat to the health and safety of our most vulnerable. We will continue to work with our law enforcement partners to remove these poisons from our streets.”

“These are brazen illegal activities. Not only are many of these stores selling illegal THC vapes, they are also selling pre-rolled marijuana cigarettes. The law is the law in Kansas, and it will be enforced,” said Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach. "A young teen attempting to purchase tobacco would meet more resistance than they would if buying marijuana from one of the shops included in today’s operation."

TOPEKA, Kan.&nbsp;– The Kansas Bureau of Investigation (KBI) executed numerous search warrants in cities across the state at vape shops and CBD dispensaries to seize products being sold illegally in Kansas, according to a media release from the agency.<figure>
 <img src="https://media.eaglewebservices.com/public/2025/3/1741774631945.png" alt="Google image" />
 <figcaption>Google image</figcaption>
 </figure>On Wednesday,&nbsp; Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach and KBI Director Tony Mattivi announced KBI agents began a statewide enforcement operation, along with law enforcement partners, to seize marijuana vegetation, THC vape cartridges, and other items containing suspected illegal concentrations of THC (as prohibited in KSA 21-5705, and KSA 2-3908). In some instances, weapons and currency were also seized.When these investigations conclude, the KBI will submit case findings to the prosecutor of jurisdiction for each charging decisions. Possible charges could include unlawful distribution of controlled substances and possession of controlled substances with the intent to sell.“These illegal substances are in our homes, in our schools, and in the hands of our children. They are so widely-accessible that some Kansans are under the impression they are safe,” said KBI Director Tony Mattivi. “Anyone who sells illicit products poses a direct and unacceptable threat to the health and safety of our most vulnerable. We will continue to work with our law enforcement partners to remove these poisons from our streets.”“These are brazen illegal activities. Not only are many of these stores selling illegal THC vapes, they are also selling pre-rolled marijuana cigarettes. The law is the law in Kansas, and it will be enforced,” said Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach. "A young teen attempting to purchase tobacco would meet more resistance than they would if buying marijuana from one of the shops included in today’s operation."

KBI conducts statewide marijuana enforcement operation

By:<a href="https://missouriindependent.com/author/joshmerchant/">Josh Merchant</a>

A large majority of Jackson County voters have&nbsp;cast ballots to recall County Executive Frank White Jr. Preliminary results from Sept. 30 reveal 85% of voters supported the recall.

The open question is whether those results will stand up against ongoing legal challenges.

As soon as the vote is certified, White’s position will be considered immediately vacant and the campaign for the next county executive — which has been&nbsp;<a href="https://thebeaconnews.org/stories/2025/09/24/jackson-county-executive-frank-white-recall-replacement/" target="_blank">quietly happening behind the scenes for weeks</a>&nbsp;—&nbsp;will kick into high gear.

But it’s possible that the election result may not be certified soon.

You may have noticed that this year’s recall election was scheduled for an unusual September election date — instead of the normal schedule in early April, June, August or November. (Special bond elections sometimes happen in February, as well.)

Elections are almost always on those regularly scheduled election days.

That could explain why voter turnout was relatively low. White was voted out of office yesterday by just 16% of Jackson County voters — compared to the 48% that turned out in the 2022 general election where White won reelection. In Kansas City specifically, turnout for the Frank White recall was even lower at 11%.

White and the Kansas City and Jackson County election boards argue that a Sept. 30 election is not just unusual, but illegal. And that could spell doom for the recall vote if a judge agrees with them.

A judge initially set the Sept. 30 date as a compromise with the recall campaign, which initially wanted to set the date for Aug. 26. The election boards argued in court that scheduling an August election on such short notice would disenfranchise military and overseas voters, who would not have received their ballots in time.

Now, White’s lawyer is&nbsp;<a href="https://www.courts.mo.gov/cnet/cases/newHeader.do?inputVO.caseNumber=SC101299&amp;inputVO.courtId=OSCDB0024_SUP#docket" target="_blank">asking the Missouri Supreme Court directly</a>&nbsp;to stop the election boards from certifying the vote until they hear the case.

Here’s how that could affect Tuesday’s vote.

Why did the election boards sue to reschedule the election?

The Jackson County Legislature initially ordered the election to be held on Aug. 26 after approving the ballot language in early July.

That’s based on a requirement set by an&nbsp;<a href="https://jacksonco.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=6313464&amp;GUID=48E9CAB8-5E5B-4FF1-9C1B-E6FEB76EC474&amp;Options=ID%7CText%7C&amp;Search=5782&amp;FullText=1" target="_blank">ordinance in 2023</a>&nbsp;that a special recall election be held within 60 days after signatures are filed.

But both the Kansas City Election Board and the Jackson County Election Board objected.

Those offices, which operate independently from White and the rest of county government, said that wasn’t enough time to prepare an election.

Military ballots would have needed to be mailed out just days later, and the boards would have had only about a week to prepare for absentee voting to begin.

DaRon McGee, chair of the county Legislature, was not sympathetic. McGee is one of the candidates vying to replace White now that he has been recalled.

“I am deeply concerned by reports that this election may not move forward on the timeline the law requires,”&nbsp;<a href="https://www.kcur.org/politics-elections-and-government/2025-07-08/jackson-county-election-board-frank-white-recall-election-almost-impossible-legislature-voting" target="_blank">he told KCUR in a statement at the time</a>. “The Legislature has done its part. We now look to the executive branch and the election board(s) to fulfill their roles.”

They argued that Missouri law only allows counties to schedule elections on regular election days — in February, April, August or November, unless otherwise specified in a city or county charter. The Aug. 5 election was already underway, so they asked a judge to reschedule the election for Nov. 4.

Notably,&nbsp;<a href="https://jcebmo.org/election-information/election-results/" target="_blank">every countywide Jackson County election for the past 27 years</a>&nbsp;has occurred the Tuesday after the first Monday of February, April, August or November.

The&nbsp;<a href="https://www.kceb.org/elections/election-results/" target="_blank">same generally goes for elections in Kansas City</a>, which also schedules City Council elections in April and June under the city’s charter. The only recent exceptions were elections related to the streetcar in October 2017, December 2012 and on a Friday in August 2008.

The Jackson County circuit judge, Marty W. Seaton, ultimately&nbsp;<a href="https://www.courts.mo.gov/fv/c/2516-CV21560-Order%20and%20Judgment_FINAL.pdf?courtCode=16&amp;di=28506132" target="_blank">disagreed with the election boards</a>.

He said that Missouri statute&nbsp;<a href="https://revisor.mo.gov/main/OneSection.aspx?section=115.123" target="_blank">carves out an exception</a>&nbsp;for elections that are authorized by a county’s charter. He argued that meant the 2023 Jackson County ordinance allowed a recall to happen outside of those dates in order to meet the 60-day requirement.

But he said an Aug. 26 election would still be too soon because military and overseas voters wouldn’t get their ballots in time, which would be unconstitutional. So he set a compromise date of Sept. 30.

The election boards wanted to appeal, but a procedural move made that impossible.

Weeks earlier, while the case was playing out, White joined the lawsuit, arguing that the recall petition signatures themselves were illegal because some of the signature gatherers were not Missouri residents.

The judge heard arguments on the election date, but he set aside the issue of the out-of-state signature gatherers.

And because that issue remains unresolved, Seaton&nbsp;<a href="https://www.courts.mo.gov/fv/c/2516-CV21560-Order%20On%20Rule%2074_FINAL.pdf?courtCode=16&amp;di=28780431" target="_blank">has not certified his ruling yet</a>. That locked the election boards out of immediately appealing to a higher court.

So on Sept. 26, White’s lawyers tried a different maneuver.

They filed a lawsuit directly with the Western District Court of Appeals asking it to postpone the election until November because the election boards have not been able to appeal the circuit judge’s interpretation of the law.

“The election is imminent, and the trial court refused to certify its ruling for appeal,” White’s lawyers wrote. “Unless this Court intervenes, an unlawful election will proceed, wasting taxpayer resources, confusing voters, and undermining public confidence in Missouri elections.”

If this legal precedent stands, they argued, it would&nbsp;<a href="https://www.courts.mo.gov/fv/c/Statement%20In%20Support%20of%20Petition%20for%20Writ%20of%20Prohibition%20and%20or%20Mandamus.PDF?courtCode=WA&amp;di=500996" target="_blank">waste taxpayer dollars and confuse voters</a>. If Jackson County can set an election for any day of the year, voters who are less tuned in to county politics may not even know that they’re missing an election.

The judge at the Western District Court of Appeals declined to take up the case. So now they’re taking it to the Missouri Supreme Court.

White’s lawyers filed a lawsuit against Seaton, the Jackson County circuit judge, just hours before the polls closed on Sept. 30, arguing that the election was illegally scheduled. They argued that proceeding with the election before the legal challenges are resolved would create chaos and distrust.

“Once results are released, the damage to public confidence cannot be undone,”<a href="https://www.courts.mo.gov/fv/c/Statement%20in%20Support%20of%20Petition%20for%20Writ%20of%20Prohibition%20andor%20Mandamus.PDF?courtCode=SC&amp;di=212794" target="_blank">&nbsp;the lawyers argued in their lawsuit filed with the Missouri Supreme Court</a>. “Securing ballots until this Court resolves the legal issues preserves the integrity of both the vote and the judicial process.”

Phil LeVota, an attorney representing the recall effort in court who is also a candidate to become county executive if White is recalled, believes that Seaton’s ruling is strong enough to hold up in an appeal.

“He made a pretty good order where he really cited a lot of case law,” he said. “The charter says 60 days, and I’m going to err on the side of getting it in front of people sooner than later. And there’s no downside to having (the election) on Sept. 30.”

But White’s lawyers point to a 2002 precedent when a court ruled that a “floating timeframe” (like the 60-day requirement set by the 2023 ordinance) does not qualify as a specific election date authorized by law.

The Jackson County Circuit Court judge believes that the Sept. 30 election date was legal. But no other judges have given a legal opinion to back it up.

There are still a couple of legal avenues for White and the election boards to challenge the results.

The first option is the most recent Missouri Supreme Court case. White asked the judge to prevent the election boards from certifying the election results until the legal questions are resolved. That would keep White in office as county executive until the judges decide whether the election was legal.

The second option is that the election boards appeal the case once the circuit judge certifies his ruling. At that point, the Western District Court of Appeals — and potentially the Missouri Supreme Court —&nbsp;would hear the case and decide whether Seaton was correct in setting the election for Sept. 30.

The third option is for White to challenge the election results by suing the election boards. He could argue that there is reason to believe the election was unlawfully administered, and he could cite the election boards’ own argument in court earlier this year that Sept. 30 was not a legal date for an election.

If any of those judges decides that Sept. 30 was an illegal date to hold an election, the court could order another election for a redo. At this point, that likely would not happen until April 2026.

This wouldn’t be the first time that a ballot question had to go to voters for a redo.

In November 2022, Missouri voters voted on a constitutional amendment to force Kansas City to increase its level of police funding from 20% of its budget to 25%.

That constitutional amendment, put on the ballot by the Missouri General Assembly, passed by a wide margin —&nbsp;nearly two-thirds of Missourians voted “yes.”

But then the Missouri Supreme Court ruled that the ballot language was misleading. So a judge struck down the measure and ordered a new election with updated ballot language.

It still passed, but by a much smaller margin —&nbsp;by about 24,000 votes, or 2.2%.

With these legal questions looming, a messy scenario rests on the horizon.

Imagine that the election boards certify the vote later this week or next week. The county executive position is vacated, and the county Legislature appoints a replacement.

Meanwhile, the appeals court or the Missouri Supreme Court takes up White’s case about whether Sept. 30 was a legal date to hold an election.

And suppose they rule in White’s favor —&nbsp;that elections must be scheduled only on days that are specifically outlined by Missouri statute or the county charter.

That would mean that legally, White never should have been removed from office. And Jackson County would then have two county executives.

LeVota believes the circuit judge’s ruling is compelling enough that an appeals court or the state Supreme Court would back it up. But he acknowledged the possibility of a political crisis as a result of the ongoing litigation around the recall.

“The appeals court could come back,” LeVota said, “and say, ‘You know what, we don’t think the trial judge was right. We think it should have been a November election. We’re throwing that entire election out, and we’ll have to do a new one.’ That could definitely, definitely happen.”

This&nbsp;<a href="https://thebeaconnews.org/stories/2025/09/30/frank-white-recall-results-legal-challenges/" target="_blank">article</a>&nbsp;first appeared on&nbsp;<a href="https://thebeaconnews.org/" target="_blank">Beacon: Kansas City</a>&nbsp;and is republished here under a&nbsp;<a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/" target="_blank">Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>.

<figure>
 <img src="https://media.eaglewebservices.com/public/2025/7/1752668060379.png" alt="Jackson County Executive Frank White Jr. (Courtesy of Jackson County)" />
 <figcaption>Jackson County Executive Frank White Jr. (Courtesy of Jackson County)</figcaption>
 </figure>By:<a href="https://missouriindependent.com/author/joshmerchant/">Josh Merchant</a>A large majority of Jackson County voters have&nbsp;cast ballots to recall County Executive Frank White Jr. Preliminary results from Sept. 30 reveal 85% of voters supported the recall.The open question is whether those results will stand up against ongoing legal challenges.As soon as the vote is certified, White’s position will be considered immediately vacant and the campaign for the next county executive — which has been&nbsp;<a href="https://thebeaconnews.org/stories/2025/09/24/jackson-county-executive-frank-white-recall-replacement/" target="_blank">quietly happening behind the scenes for weeks</a>&nbsp;—&nbsp;will kick into high gear.But it’s possible that the election result may not be certified soon.You may have noticed that this year’s recall election was scheduled for an unusual September election date — instead of the normal schedule in early April, June, August or November. (Special bond elections sometimes happen in February, as well.)Elections are almost always on those regularly scheduled election days.That could explain why voter turnout was relatively low. White was voted out of office yesterday by just 16% of Jackson County voters — compared to the 48% that turned out in the 2022 general election where White won reelection. In Kansas City specifically, turnout for the Frank White recall was even lower at 11%.White and the Kansas City and Jackson County election boards argue that a Sept. 30 election is not just unusual, but illegal. And that could spell doom for the recall vote if a judge agrees with them.A judge initially set the Sept. 30 date as a compromise with the recall campaign, which initially wanted to set the date for Aug. 26. The election boards argued in court that scheduling an August election on such short notice would disenfranchise military and overseas voters, who would not have received their ballots in time.Now, White’s lawyer is&nbsp;<a href="https://www.courts.mo.gov/cnet/cases/newHeader.do?inputVO.caseNumber=SC101299&amp;inputVO.courtId=OSCDB0024_SUP#docket" target="_blank">asking the Missouri Supreme Court directly</a>&nbsp;to stop the election boards from certifying the vote until they hear the case.Here’s how that could affect Tuesday’s vote.<h2>Why did the election boards sue to reschedule the election?</h2>The Jackson County Legislature initially ordered the election to be held on Aug. 26 after approving the ballot language in early July.That’s based on a requirement set by an&nbsp;<a href="https://jacksonco.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=6313464&amp;GUID=48E9CAB8-5E5B-4FF1-9C1B-E6FEB76EC474&amp;Options=ID%7CText%7C&amp;Search=5782&amp;FullText=1" target="_blank">ordinance in 2023</a>&nbsp;that a special recall election be held within 60 days after signatures are filed.But both the Kansas City Election Board and the Jackson County Election Board objected.Those offices, which operate independently from White and the rest of county government, said that wasn’t enough time to prepare an election.Military ballots would have needed to be mailed out just days later, and the boards would have had only about a week to prepare for absentee voting to begin.DaRon McGee, chair of the county Legislature, was not sympathetic. McGee is one of the candidates vying to replace White now that he has been recalled.“I am deeply concerned by reports that this election may not move forward on the timeline the law requires,”&nbsp;<a href="https://www.kcur.org/politics-elections-and-government/2025-07-08/jackson-county-election-board-frank-white-recall-election-almost-impossible-legislature-voting" target="_blank">he told KCUR in a statement at the time</a>. “The Legislature has done its part. We now look to the executive branch and the election board(s) to fulfill their roles.”So the election boards sued.They argued that Missouri law only allows counties to schedule elections on regular election days — in February, April, August or November, unless otherwise specified in a city or county charter. The Aug. 5 election was already underway, so they asked a judge to reschedule the election for Nov. 4.Notably,&nbsp;<a href="https://jcebmo.org/election-information/election-results/" target="_blank">every countywide Jackson County election for the past 27 years</a>&nbsp;has occurred the Tuesday after the first Monday of February, April, August or November.The&nbsp;<a href="https://www.kceb.org/elections/election-results/" target="_blank">same generally goes for elections in Kansas City</a>, which also schedules City Council elections in April and June under the city’s charter. The only recent exceptions were elections related to the streetcar in October 2017, December 2012 and on a Friday in August 2008.The Jackson County circuit judge, Marty W. Seaton, ultimately&nbsp;<a href="https://www.courts.mo.gov/fv/c/2516-CV21560-Order%20and%20Judgment_FINAL.pdf?courtCode=16&amp;di=28506132" target="_blank">disagreed with the election boards</a>.He said that Missouri statute&nbsp;<a href="https://revisor.mo.gov/main/OneSection.aspx?section=115.123" target="_blank">carves out an exception</a>&nbsp;for elections that are authorized by a county’s charter. He argued that meant the 2023 Jackson County ordinance allowed a recall to happen outside of those dates in order to meet the 60-day requirement.But he said an Aug. 26 election would still be too soon because military and overseas voters wouldn’t get their ballots in time, which would be unconstitutional. So he set a compromise date of Sept. 30.<h2>The legal battle continues</h2>The election boards wanted to appeal, but a procedural move made that impossible.Weeks earlier, while the case was playing out, White joined the lawsuit, arguing that the recall petition signatures themselves were illegal because some of the signature gatherers were not Missouri residents.The judge heard arguments on the election date, but he set aside the issue of the out-of-state signature gatherers.And because that issue remains unresolved, Seaton&nbsp;<a href="https://www.courts.mo.gov/fv/c/2516-CV21560-Order%20On%20Rule%2074_FINAL.pdf?courtCode=16&amp;di=28780431" target="_blank">has not certified his ruling yet</a>. That locked the election boards out of immediately appealing to a higher court.So on Sept. 26, White’s lawyers tried a different maneuver.They filed a lawsuit directly with the Western District Court of Appeals asking it to postpone the election until November because the election boards have not been able to appeal the circuit judge’s interpretation of the law.“The election is imminent, and the trial court refused to certify its ruling for appeal,” White’s lawyers wrote. “Unless this Court intervenes, an unlawful election will proceed, wasting taxpayer resources, confusing voters, and undermining public confidence in Missouri elections.”If this legal precedent stands, they argued, it would&nbsp;<a href="https://www.courts.mo.gov/fv/c/Statement%20In%20Support%20of%20Petition%20for%20Writ%20of%20Prohibition%20and%20or%20Mandamus.PDF?courtCode=WA&amp;di=500996" target="_blank">waste taxpayer dollars and confuse voters</a>. If Jackson County can set an election for any day of the year, voters who are less tuned in to county politics may not even know that they’re missing an election.The judge at the Western District Court of Appeals declined to take up the case. So now they’re taking it to the Missouri Supreme Court.White’s lawyers filed a lawsuit against Seaton, the Jackson County circuit judge, just hours before the polls closed on Sept. 30, arguing that the election was illegally scheduled. They argued that proceeding with the election before the legal challenges are resolved would create chaos and distrust.“Once results are released, the damage to public confidence cannot be undone,”<a href="https://www.courts.mo.gov/fv/c/Statement%20in%20Support%20of%20Petition%20for%20Writ%20of%20Prohibition%20andor%20Mandamus.PDF?courtCode=SC&amp;di=212794" target="_blank">&nbsp;the lawyers argued in their lawsuit filed with the Missouri Supreme Court</a>. “Securing ballots until this Court resolves the legal issues preserves the integrity of both the vote and the judicial process.”Phil LeVota, an attorney representing the recall effort in court who is also a candidate to become county executive if White is recalled, believes that Seaton’s ruling is strong enough to hold up in an appeal.“He made a pretty good order where he really cited a lot of case law,” he said. “The charter says 60 days, and I’m going to err on the side of getting it in front of people sooner than later. And there’s no downside to having (the election) on Sept. 30.”But White’s lawyers point to a 2002 precedent when a court ruled that a “floating timeframe” (like the 60-day requirement set by the 2023 ordinance) does not qualify as a specific election date authorized by law.<h2>Election outcome could be reversed</h2>The Jackson County Circuit Court judge believes that the Sept. 30 election date was legal. But no other judges have given a legal opinion to back it up.There are still a couple of legal avenues for White and the election boards to challenge the results.The first option is the most recent Missouri Supreme Court case. White asked the judge to prevent the election boards from certifying the election results until the legal questions are resolved. That would keep White in office as county executive until the judges decide whether the election was legal.The second option is that the election boards appeal the case once the circuit judge certifies his ruling. At that point, the Western District Court of Appeals — and potentially the Missouri Supreme Court —&nbsp;would hear the case and decide whether Seaton was correct in setting the election for Sept. 30.The third option is for White to challenge the election results by suing the election boards. He could argue that there is reason to believe the election was unlawfully administered, and he could cite the election boards’ own argument in court earlier this year that Sept. 30 was not a legal date for an election.If any of those judges decides that Sept. 30 was an illegal date to hold an election, the court could order another election for a redo. At this point, that likely would not happen until April 2026.This wouldn’t be the first time that a ballot question had to go to voters for a redo.In November 2022, Missouri voters voted on a constitutional amendment to force Kansas City to increase its level of police funding from 20% of its budget to 25%.That constitutional amendment, put on the ballot by the Missouri General Assembly, passed by a wide margin —&nbsp;nearly two-thirds of Missourians voted “yes.”But then the Missouri Supreme Court ruled that the ballot language was misleading. So a judge struck down the measure and ordered a new election with updated ballot language.It still passed, but by a much smaller margin —&nbsp;by about 24,000 votes, or 2.2%.With these legal questions looming, a messy scenario rests on the horizon.Imagine that the election boards certify the vote later this week or next week. The county executive position is vacated, and the county Legislature appoints a replacement.Meanwhile, the appeals court or the Missouri Supreme Court takes up White’s case about whether Sept. 30 was a legal date to hold an election.And suppose they rule in White’s favor —&nbsp;that elections must be scheduled only on days that are specifically outlined by Missouri statute or the county charter.That would mean that legally, White never should have been removed from office. And Jackson County would then have two county executives.LeVota believes the circuit judge’s ruling is compelling enough that an appeals court or the state Supreme Court would back it up. But he acknowledged the possibility of a political crisis as a result of the ongoing litigation around the recall.“The appeals court could come back,” LeVota said, “and say, ‘You know what, we don’t think the trial judge was right. We think it should have been a November election. We’re throwing that entire election out, and we’ll have to do a new one.’ That could definitely, definitely happen.”This&nbsp;<a href="https://thebeaconnews.org/stories/2025/09/30/frank-white-recall-results-legal-challenges/" target="_blank">article</a>&nbsp;first appeared on&nbsp;<a href="https://thebeaconnews.org/" target="_blank">Beacon: Kansas City</a>&nbsp;and is republished here under a&nbsp;<a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/" target="_blank">Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>.

Voters recalled  Jackson Co. Executive Frank White. Will that hold up in court?

The government shutdown has begun after Congress failed to strike an agreement to keep government programs and services running by Wednesday’s deadline. Several members of the Missouri Congressional delegation responded to the stalemate on social media.

The government shutdown has begun after Congress failed to strike an agreement to keep government programs and services running by Wednesday’s deadline. Several members of the Missouri Congressional delegation responded to the stalemate on social media.<div><blockquote class="twitter-tweet">🔥 HOT NEW SINGLE JUST DROPPED 🔥 🎵 “THE SCHUMER SHUTDOWN” <a href="https://t.co/KwQuAUhS6a">pic.twitter.com/KwQuAUhS6a</a>&mdash; Rep. Eric Burlison (@RepEricBurlison) <a href="https://twitter.com/RepEricBurlison/status/1973236435621720381?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 1, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div><div><blockquote class="twitter-tweet">The House passed the funding bill on September 19th. We did our work to keep the government open.&mdash; Rep. Sam Graves (@RepSamGraves) <a href="https://twitter.com/RepSamGraves/status/1973177999861358597?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 1, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div><div><blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Republicans control both Congress and the White House. If the government shuts down, it’s on their watch. Democrats are ready to work on funding the government—but we will not be idle and let health care premiums soar for hardworking Americans. If this shutdown has you worried… <a href="https://t.co/43XUCpkQOO">pic.twitter.com/43XUCpkQOO</a>&mdash; Congressman Wesley Bell (@RepWesleyBellMO) <a href="https://twitter.com/RepWesleyBellMO/status/1973195494475116918?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 1, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div><div><blockquote class="twitter-tweet">I just voted YES to keep the government open and fight for the American people. <a href="https://t.co/1Lc0U7PuVx">pic.twitter.com/1Lc0U7PuVx</a>&mdash; Senator Eric Schmitt (@SenEricSchmitt) <a href="https://twitter.com/SenEricSchmitt/status/1973162473579749867?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 30, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div><div><blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Democrats would rather fight <a href="https://twitter.com/POTUS?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@POTUS</a> and Republicans than fight for Americans.👇 <a href="https://t.co/EWXWJBSOoM">pic.twitter.com/EWXWJBSOoM</a>&mdash; Rep. Mark Alford (@RepMarkAlford) <a href="https://twitter.com/RepMarkAlford/status/1973181558766129287?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 1, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div><div><blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Another demonstration of the administration’s lack of seriousness. Republicans control the House, Senate, and White House. And with a government shutdown approaching, they’re using government websites to mislead the American people instead of negotiating a bipartisan deal. <a href="https://t.co/2doCkXHk0I">https://t.co/2doCkXHk0I</a>&mdash; Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (@repcleaver) <a href="https://twitter.com/repcleaver/status/1973119586867487052?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 30, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div><div><blockquote class="twitter-tweet">RELEASE: Wagner Slams Democrats for Shutting Down Government Read the full statement here ⬇️⬇️⬇️<a href="https://t.co/XJLMlmlIX8">https://t.co/XJLMlmlIX8</a>&mdash; Ann Wagner (@RepAnnWagner) <a href="https://twitter.com/RepAnnWagner/status/1973371276715590005?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 1, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div><div><blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Democrats are rejecting a straightforward plan to keep the government open. Instead they are demanding over $1 trillion in new spending on items like free health care for illegal aliens while cutting $50 billion in investments for rural health care. Washington Democrats would…&mdash; Rep. Jason Smith (@RepJasonSmith) <a href="https://twitter.com/RepJasonSmith/status/1973066350043251084?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 30, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>

🎥Missouri lawmakers respond to government shutdown

The government shutdown has begun after Congress failed to strike an agreement to keep government programs and services running by Wednesday’s deadline. Members of the Nebraska Congressional delegation responded to the stalemate.

The government shutdown has begun after Congress failed to strike an agreement to keep government programs and services running by Wednesday’s deadline. Members of the Nebraska Congressional delegation responded to the stalemate.<div><blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Today, I voted for a clean funding resolution that keeps the government open so Congress can continue working on our full-year funding bills. The Democrats, instead, voted for a $1 trillion increase in new spending and to eliminate the $50 billion Rural Hospital Stabilization…&mdash; Senator Deb Fischer (@SenatorFischer) <a href="https://twitter.com/SenatorFischer/status/1973168744441495601?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 30, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div><div><blockquote class="twitter-tweet">My full statement after Democrat Leadership failed to pass a clean CR ⬇️ <a href="https://t.co/AG7PlmwlGG">pic.twitter.com/AG7PlmwlGG</a>&mdash; Rep. Don Bacon 🇺🇸✈️🏍️⭐️🎖️ (@RepDonBacon) <a href="https://twitter.com/RepDonBacon/status/1973210532833533982?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 1, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div><div><blockquote class="twitter-tweet">The Democrats just voted to shutdown government. They voted against a clean continuing resolution (CR) that would have funded government for seven weeks. Previously, they had voted for this exact budget. In fact, Democrats voted for a clean CR 13 times under Joe Biden. This…&mdash; Senator Pete Ricketts (@SenatorRicketts) <a href="https://twitter.com/SenatorRicketts/status/1973167795832758634?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 30, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div><div><blockquote class="twitter-tweet">NEW: The Democrat government shutdown will have big consequences for the National Flood Insurance Program. Here are a couple of things I want you to know from my perspective as the Chairman of the Housing and Insurance Subcommittee 👇 <a href="https://t.co/9vYQid40eO">pic.twitter.com/9vYQid40eO</a>&mdash; Rep. Mike Flood (@USRepMikeFlood) <a href="https://twitter.com/USRepMikeFlood/status/1973183509612339208?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 1, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div><div><blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Earlier this month <a href="https://twitter.com/HouseGOP?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@HouseGOP</a> passed a clean CR to provide time to responsibly address spending--the reasonable way forward. Let’s be clear, this is an avoidable shutdown. <a href="https://t.co/NWXQSqNz7l">pic.twitter.com/NWXQSqNz7l</a>&mdash; Rep. Adrian Smith (@RepAdrianSmith) <a href="https://twitter.com/RepAdrianSmith/status/1973151417801253098?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 30, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>

🎥Nebraska lawmakers respond to government shutdown

TOPEKA — A Kansas district court judge on Tuesday dismissed a case filed by Attorney General Kris Kobach that challenged the right of Gov. Laura Kelly’s administration to withhold Kansans’ personal data from the federal government.

In a 21-page order, Judge Teresa Watson sided with Department for Children and Families secretary Laura Howard, citing multiple issues with Kobach’s request to force the release of data related to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.

The federal government’s Food and Nutrition Services program in May began demanding the release of personal information of people who have applied for or used the SNAP program.&nbsp;<a href="https://kansasreflector.com/2025/07/30/state-officials-again-refuse-to-release-kansans-personal-data-to-usda/">Howard repeatedly denied the release</a>, pointing to regulations guiding how data should be shared between agencies.

Kobach took&nbsp;<a href="https://kansasreflector.com/2025/09/19/sad-political-stunt-lawsuit-between-kobach-kansas-governor-heats-up/">Howard and the state to court</a>&nbsp;to force the release of the data, indicating in court filings that he believes compliance is required by state and federal law. He also expressed concern that $10.4 million related to SNAP administrative funding would be withheld from Kansas by the federal government because of the failure to turn over the data.

“We disagree with the judge’s interpretation of ripeness and are considering an appeal. Regardless, the governor continues to defy Kansas law,” Kobach said in a statement to Kansas Reflector. “Needy Kansans have now lost $10.4 million in food assistance because of her political theatrics. That money is not coming back.”

Ripeness refers to part of Watson’s reasoning for choosing to dismiss the case and refers to whether a case is developed and appropriate to be heard.

Watson said the ripeness requirement prevents courts from becoming entangled in abstract disagreements. In this case, she found that because the state has filed an appeal and the full administrative review process has not been completed, the case is not “ripe.”

Kelly, in a news release, accused Kobach of engaging in “low-rent political theater, wasting taxpayer dollars, and spreading misinformation.” She emphasized that no money has been lost from federal funding for SNAP administrative costs.

“I appreciate the court granting my administration’s motion to dismiss the lawsuit on the grounds that the Attorney General’s actions were premature as we continue through the USDA’s administrative review process and that my administration does not have a legal duty to turn over Kansans’ personal information at this time,” Kelly said.

Watson stated in her decision that considering the duties of Howard and the Kansas administration to work with the federal program doesn’t mean that they must “perform in a prescribed manner without regard to the exercise of judgment.”

The Food and Nutrition Services department offers a multi-step administrative process to appeal the decisions to withhold any dollars from Kansas, and the state has filed an appeal, Watson said.

<figure>
 <img src="https://media.eaglewebservices.com/public/2025/9/1759281317592.png" alt=" A Kansas District Court Judge dismissed a lawsuit filed by Attorney General Kris Kobach attempting to force Gov. Laura Kelly's administration to turn over food program data to the federal government. (Sherman Smith/Kansas Reflector)" />
 <figcaption> A Kansas District Court Judge dismissed a lawsuit filed by Attorney General Kris Kobach attempting to force Gov. Laura Kelly's administration to turn over food program data to the federal government. (Sherman Smith/Kansas Reflector)</figcaption>
 </figure>BY&nbsp;<a href="https://kansasreflector.com/author/mchilson/">MORGAN CHILSON</a> <a href="https://kansasreflector.com/">Kansas Reflector</a>TOPEKA — A Kansas district court judge on Tuesday dismissed a case filed by Attorney General Kris Kobach that challenged the right of Gov. Laura Kelly’s administration to withhold Kansans’ personal data from the federal government.In a 21-page order, Judge Teresa Watson sided with Department for Children and Families secretary Laura Howard, citing multiple issues with Kobach’s request to force the release of data related to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.The federal government’s Food and Nutrition Services program in May began demanding the release of personal information of people who have applied for or used the SNAP program.&nbsp;<a href="https://kansasreflector.com/2025/07/30/state-officials-again-refuse-to-release-kansans-personal-data-to-usda/">Howard repeatedly denied the release</a>, pointing to regulations guiding how data should be shared between agencies.Kobach took&nbsp;<a href="https://kansasreflector.com/2025/09/19/sad-political-stunt-lawsuit-between-kobach-kansas-governor-heats-up/">Howard and the state to court</a>&nbsp;to force the release of the data, indicating in court filings that he believes compliance is required by state and federal law. He also expressed concern that $10.4 million related to SNAP administrative funding would be withheld from Kansas by the federal government because of the failure to turn over the data.“We disagree with the judge’s interpretation of ripeness and are considering an appeal. Regardless, the governor continues to defy Kansas law,” Kobach said in a statement to Kansas Reflector. “Needy Kansans have now lost $10.4 million in food assistance because of her political theatrics. That money is not coming back.”Ripeness refers to part of Watson’s reasoning for choosing to dismiss the case and refers to whether a case is developed and appropriate to be heard.Watson said the ripeness requirement prevents courts from becoming entangled in abstract disagreements. In this case, she found that because the state has filed an appeal and the full administrative review process has not been completed, the case is not “ripe.”Kelly, in a news release, accused Kobach of engaging in “low-rent political theater, wasting taxpayer dollars, and spreading misinformation.” She emphasized that no money has been lost from federal funding for SNAP administrative costs.“I appreciate the court granting my administration’s motion to dismiss the lawsuit on the grounds that the Attorney General’s actions were premature as we continue through the USDA’s administrative review process and that my administration does not have a legal duty to turn over Kansans’ personal information at this time,” Kelly said.Watson stated in her decision that considering the duties of Howard and the Kansas administration to work with the federal program doesn’t mean that they must “perform in a prescribed manner without regard to the exercise of judgment.”The Food and Nutrition Services department offers a multi-step administrative process to appeal the decisions to withhold any dollars from Kansas, and the state has filed an appeal, Watson said.“The comprehensive administrative review available for the disallowance itself (suggests) that the state agency has some discretion in deciding how to respond to the request for SNAP participant data — or at least gives rise to the possibility of a ‘substantial dispute’ about how to respond,” Watson wrote.Kelly’s news release said Kobach has&nbsp;<a href="https://kansasreflector.com/2025/09/22/kansas-governors-office-disputes-accuracy-of-kobachs-claims-about-snap-funding/">made false claims</a>&nbsp;multiple times that the state has lost $10.4 million in administrative funding.“After the (U.S. Department of Agriculture) rejected the Kansas Department for Children and Families (DCF) Corrective Action Proposal, DCF filed an appeal with the USDA,” the news release said. “The filing of that appeal immediately prevented the USDA from withholding the $10.4 million.”Kobach disagreed.&nbsp;“It is laughable to suggest that she will be able to persuade the USDA to change its decision,” he said. “And now, because of the governor’s desire to thumb her nose at the Trump administration, needy Kansans will lose another $10.4 million of food assistance in December.”The $10.4 million funding loss, if upheld after the appeal, will occur quarterly until the state turns over the data, according to a USDA letter sent to the state. The dollars are designated for administrative cost and do not affect SNAP recipients.&nbsp;